Sample Answer, C1 English Level, Advanced, Band Score 6.5-7.5

Outline:

• 1. Introduction:
     • Paraphrase: The importance of traditional music compared to international music is a subject of contention, with some arguing that traditional music reflects a country’s cultural identity.
     • Main Opinion/Idea: This essay will discuss both views on the significance of traditional and international music and present my own perspective on the matter.
  2. Body (Detail 1):
     • Supporting sentence: Proponents of traditional music assert that it plays a vital role in preserving a country’s cultural heritage, carrying historical narratives and customs unique to a particular culture.
  3. Body (Detail 2):
     • Supporting sentence: On the other hand, advocates for international music highlight its ability to promote cultural exchange and understanding, breaking down cultural barriers and fostering a sense of global community.
  4. Conclusion:
     • Summarize: Both traditional and international music have their merits, with traditional music preserving cultural identity and international music promoting cultural enrichment.
     • Restate Main Opinion/Idea: Embracing both forms of music allows us to appreciate the richness and diversity of cultures around the world, celebrating our heritage through traditional music while embracing the global cultural tapestry woven by international music.

Essay:

The significance of traditional music versus international music is a matter of opinion, with some arguing that traditional music holds greater importance as it reflects a country’s cultural identity. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives based on my experience and knowledge, and present my opinion on this subject.

On one side of the argument, proponents of traditional music contend that it plays a crucial role in preserving a country’s cultural heritage. Traditional music often carries historical narratives, customs, and values unique to a particular culture, acting as a medium to pass down traditions from one generation to another. It connects people to their roots and fosters a sense of pride in one’s cultural identity.

On the other hand, advocates for international music argue that it promotes cultural exchange and understanding between different nations. The globalization of music allows individuals from diverse backgrounds to appreciate and connect with various musical genres, breaking down cultural barriers and fostering a sense of unity and appreciation for diversity.

In my opinion, both traditional and international music have their merits. Traditional music is undoubtedly essential in preserving cultural identity and heritage, and it should be cherished and celebrated. Simultaneously, international music contributes to cultural enrichment, broadening people’s perspectives and promoting a sense of global community.

In conclusion, the debate over the significance of traditional versus international music is subjective. While traditional music is vital in reflecting a country’s cultural identity, international music fosters cultural exchange and understanding. Embracing both forms of music allows us to appreciate the richness and diversity of cultures around the world. As individuals, we can celebrate our heritage through traditional music while also embracing the global cultural tapestry woven by international music.