Sample Answer, C1 English Level, Advanced, Band Score 6.5-7.5

Outline:

• 1. Introduction:
     • Paraphrase of the topic: Some people argue that governments should impose higher taxes on unhealthy foods and drinks to promote healthier choices.
     • Main opinion or idea: This essay will examine both sides of the argument and present a stance based on personal experiences and knowledge.
  2. Body (Detail 1):
     • Support for the main opinion: Imposing higher taxes on unhealthy foods can encourage healthier choices and lead to positive health outcomes.
     • Personal experience and knowledge: Observing how cost influences consumer behavior, higher taxes may nudge individuals towards opting for healthier alternatives.
  3. Body (Detail 2):
     • Counterargument: Opponents argue that higher taxes on unhealthy foods infringe upon personal freedom and choice.
     • Response: While the intention is well-meaning, it is essential to balance health promotion and personal autonomy.
  4. Conclusion:
     • Summary of body paragraphs: The proposal of higher taxes on unhealthy foods has merits and drawbacks.
     • Restate the main opinion: A more holistic approach, encompassing education and targeted policies, can promote healthier lifestyles without infringing on personal liberties.
     • Closing thought: By striking a balance between health promotion and individual choice, governments can contribute to improving public health effectively.

Essay:

The proposition of implementing higher taxes on unhealthy foods and drinks to encourage healthier choices sparks debate among individuals. This essay will explore both sides of the argument and present my stance based on personal experiences and knowledge.

Supporters of imposing higher taxes on unhealthy foods argue that it can lead to positive health outcomes for individuals and the population as a whole. By making unhealthy options more expensive, people may be inclined to opt for healthier alternatives, ultimately reducing the consumption of sugary, fatty, and processed foods. From my own experience, I have witnessed how cost influences consumer behavior, and higher taxes could indeed nudge people towards healthier choices.

On the contrary, opponents argue that such taxes infringe upon personal freedom and choice. They contend that individuals should have the right to make their own decisions regarding their diet, and the government should not interfere with personal preferences. Furthermore, critics express concerns about the regressive nature of such taxes, as they may disproportionately affect low-income individuals who already face financial constraints.

In my view, while the intention behind imposing higher taxes on unhealthy foods is well-meaning, it is essential to strike a balance between promoting healthier choices and respecting personal autonomy. Instead of solely relying on taxes, governments should focus on comprehensive health promotion strategies. This includes investing in public education campaigns, subsidizing healthier foods, and fostering an environment that encourages physical activity.

In conclusion, the proposal to levy higher taxes on unhealthy foods and drinks to promote healthier choices has merits and drawbacks. While it may influence consumer behavior, it also raises concerns about personal freedom and financial implications for vulnerable populations. A more holistic approach that encompasses education and targeted policies can better facilitate healthier lifestyles. By striking a balance between health promotion and individual choice, governments can contribute to improving public health without infringing upon personal liberties.